Building Resilient Communications for Regional and Volunteer Fire Services

Building Resilient Communications for Regional and Volunteer Fire Services / Mitel ANZ

You’re managing communications for a volunteer fire brigade or State Emergency Service (SES) unit, and the challenges you face are fundamentally different from your metropolitan counterparts. You don’t have a dedicated IT team. Your budget is a fraction of what city services work with. Your volunteers are skilled firefighters and emergency responders, not technology specialists. Yet when your community faces bushfires, floods, or other emergencies, you need communications reliability that matches any state agency.

The gap between what you need and what you can afford often feels insurmountable. But here’s what’s changing: the technology approaches that make enterprise-grade communications possible for regional and volunteer services don’t require enterprise-scale budgets or IT departments anymore.

The Reality of Limited Resources

Let’s be honest about what you’re working with. Your brigade might have one person who “handles the IT stuff”, usually a volunteer who’s more tech-savvy than others, not someone with formal training in telecommunications infrastructure. When something breaks, you’re troubleshooting it yourself or waiting for external support that might take days to arrive in your regional location.

Your communications budget covers basic necessities: mobile radios for trucks, phones for the station, maybe a paging system that’s been in place for decades. Investing in your own sophisticated Triple Zero centres or State Operations Centres grade infrastructure feels impossibly out of reach.

Meanwhile, your operational requirements keep increasing. You need better coordination with state fire services during major incidents. You’re expected to integrate with Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems when you’re deployed to support larger operations. Your volunteers need reliable ways to be contacted and mobilised quickly when emergencies strike. And increasingly, you’re working alongside multiple agencies where communication failures create genuine safety risks.

Shared Infrastructure: The Economical Path to Modernising your Emergency Comms Capability

Here’s the model that’s transforming regional emergency services communications: you don’t need to own and operate your own complete infrastructure. What you need is reliable access to enterprise-grade infrastructure that’s shared across multiple organisations.

State emergency services agencies are increasingly sharing their hosted communications platforms with regional and volunteer organisations. You get the same telephony capabilities, the same reliability standards, the same integration with CAD and Integrated Communications Control System (ICCS) platforms that metropolitan services use. But you’re sharing the infrastructure costs across multiple organisations, and you’re leveraging centralised IT expertise rather than needing your own.

Your volunteers still operate your brigade. Your leaders still make operational decisions. You’re just not trying to maintain telecommunications infrastructure on your own anymore.

Simplicity as a Core Requirement

You need communications systems that work without requiring constant attention.

This means looking for solutions with minimal local infrastructure requirements. Cloud-connected systems that are monitored and maintained remotely. Automatic updates that happen without requiring someone onsite. Support arrangements where expertise is available when you need it, not dependent on whether your volunteer IT person is available.

Regional connectivity has improved dramatically in recent years. Many areas that struggled with basic internet access now have reliable NBN or mobile broadband connections. These modern day enhanced broadband networks open up a world of first class capabilities that were previously impossible in regional areas. Enterprise-grade telephony can now run on internet connections rather than requiring expensive dedicated telecommunications infrastructure.

The key is selecting modern platforms designed for these enhanced networks but with the architecture to ensure dependable local backup and failover should the unthinkable happen – network outages – which are unfortunately not that uncommon as recent events have shown.

Building Resilient Communications for Regional and Volunteer Fire Services / Mitel ANZ

Cost Structures That Actually Work for Volunteer organisations

Capital expenditure budgets are challenging for volunteer organisations. Finding tens of thousands of dollars for infrastructure investment requires fundraising, grants, or competing for limited government funding. Even when you secure capital funding, the ongoing operational costs can be unsustainable.

Modern communications platforms offer operational expenditure models instead. Rather than large upfront investments, you’re paying ongoing subscription costs that align with your actual usage. For a volunteer brigade that handles dozens of incidents per year rather than thousands, the cost of modernising your technology may be made more affordable in such ‘opex’ arrangements compared to spending upfront in a ‘capex’ model.

Look for pricing models based on what you actually need. Maybe you need fewer concurrent user licenses than a metropolitan Fire Service call centre, but you need the same integration capabilities with their CAD systems. Maybe you need access to advanced features during fire season but minimal capability outside peak periods. Flexible, usage-based pricing makes these scenarios economically viable in ways traditional dedicated infrastructure ownership never could.

Integration Without the Integration Burden

When your volunteers deploy to support major incidents, they need to slot into larger response operations seamlessly. That means your communications must integrate with state-level CAD systems, radio networks, and command structures. Traditionally, achieving this integration required expensive custom development and ongoing maintenance.

Modern platforms handle integration through standardised protocols and Application Programming Interfaces (APIs). When your communications platform and the state CAD system both support standard interfaces, integration becomes a configuration exercise rather than a development project. Updates to either system don’t break connectivity. You’re not dependent on maintaining custom code that becomes increasingly brittle over time.

This standardisation matters enormously for volunteer services. It means you can connect to sophisticated emergency services ecosystems without needing sophisticated technical expertise or ongoing development budgets.

The Interoperability Imperative

Major incidents always involve multiple organisations. Focus on platforms that make multi-agency communication straightforward. Establishing conference calls with partner organisations should be simple enough that your volunteers can do it under stress. Inter-agency connectivity during mutual aid deployments should be seamless. Radio bridges that let different agencies coordinate should be standard features, not expensive add-ons.

You’re not asking for sophisticated capabilities here, you’re asking for functional interoperability that makes joint operations work the way they need to work. That’s achievable with modern communications platforms in ways it wasn’t with legacy infrastructure.

Moving Forward Strategically

If your current communications platforms feel like you could be served better, then it is viable to consider new and modern approaches to enhance how you serve the community. The solution isn’t trying to replicate metropolitan fire services investments on the budgets of regional agencies. It’s leveraging modern approaches that deliver enterprise-grade capability through shared infrastructure, simplified operations, and flexible cost structures.

Talk to your state emergency services agency about their shared infrastructure programs. Investigate platforms designed specifically for regional and volunteer deployment. Focus on reliability and simplicity rather than features you’ll never use.

Your volunteers deserve communications infrastructure that supports them rather than creating additional burdens. Your community deserves emergency response that isn’t hampered by technology limitations. Both are achievable.

Exploring communications options for your regional or volunteer emergency service? Connect with specialists who understand the unique requirements and constraints of volunteer brigade operations.

Building Resilient Communications for Regional and Volunteer Fire Services / Mitel ANZ

White Paper:

How ANZ Emergency Services Can Navigate the Technology Transition Without Compromising Lives